Prince Andrew Interview Transcript about Epstein

The royals are totally immune to any legal action, in the past, present, and future. undemocratic, elitist, corrupt, archaic, perverted, and they firmly believe they are above the law.

cathy fox blog on child abuse

BBC Newsnight transcript: from  2019 Nov 11 Daily Express Archive Prince Andrew BBC: Newsnight interview – FULL TRANSCRIPT [1]

Interviewer:

 Your Royal Highness, we’ve come to Buckingham Place in highly unusual circumstances. Normally, we’d be discussing your work, your duty and we’ll come onto that but today you’ve chosen to speak out for the first time. Why have you decided to talk now?

Prince Andrew:

 Because there is no good time to talk about Mr Epstein and all things associated and we’ve been talking to Newsnight for about six months about doing something around the work that I was doing and unfortunately we’ve just not been able to fit it into either your schedule or my schedule until now. And actually it’s a very good opportunity and I’m delighted to be able to see you today.

Interviewer:

 As you say, all of this goes back to your…

View original post 8,374 more words

GAY BYRNE ,TV STAR WHO CHALLENGED IRISH SOCIETY, AND HOST OF THE LONG-RUNNING TABOO-BREAKING THE LATE LATE SHOW.

Gay Byrne, TV star who ‘challenged Irish society’, dies aged 85

Tributes pour in for host of long-running, taboo-breaking The Late Late Show.BUT NOT ONE FROM MR MARBELLA AS THE LATE SHOW WAS THE SHOW HE LUSTED FOR BUT WHEN GAY RETIRED HE AND THE NETWORK MADE SURE HE DID NOT GET IT. SAD REALLY AS HE COULD HAVE GOT IT BUT HE TREAD ON TOO MANY TOES .If the truth were know his religion was not the right one for ireland and the network possibly.

Gay Byrne with his wife Kathleen in 2004.
 Gay Byrne with his wife Kathleen in 2004. Photograph: Jeremy Craine/Rex/Shutterstock

It was said there was no sex in Ireland until the The Late Late Show, and for that a nation owed thanks to Gay Byrne.

Generations grew up watching the host of RTÉ’s long-running chatshow blend light entertainment with current affairs and taboo-shattering moments, a cultural rendezvous that dominated Friday night viewing and presaged a new Ireland.

The Gay Byrne era officially ended on Monday when he died at home in Dublin, surrounded by family, aged 85. Tributes flowed.

“Through his work in radio and on television he challenged Irish society, and shone a light not only on the bright but also the dark sides of Irish life,” said the president, Michael D Higgins. “In doing so, he became one of the most familiar and distinctive voices of our times, helping shape our conscience, our self-image, and our idea of who we might be.”

Leo Varadkar, the taoiseach, said: “The story of his remarkable contribution to Irish life is the story of how we changed and evolved as a society over the past 60 years. A consummate entertainer, he also provided a voice for all those who had been silenced or were afraid to speak up, and he forced us to confront things that needed to be challenged in our society.”

Ireland had braced for the death of Uncle Gaybo, as many called him, since he revealed he had prostate cancer in 2016.

Byrne hosted The Late Late Show from 1962 to 1999, one of the world’s longest chatshow runs, as well as a radio show and other gigs such as the Rose of Tralee.

Gay Byrne in 1962.
 Gay Byrne in 1962. Photograph: ITV/Rex/Shutterstock

He was an affable everyman who could banter with guests and audiences while precipitating controversy in a socially conservative society dominated by the Catholic church.

During a quiz item for married couples in 1966 Byrne asked a contestant what colour nightie she had worn on the night of her honeymoon. She hadn’t worn any, she replied.

The bishop of Clonfert, Thomas Ryan, protested in what became known as as the “bishop and the nightie” incident, splitting the country into those who were scandalised and those who roared laughing.

A prominent Fine Gael politician, Oliver Flanagan, was among the former. “Sex never came to Ireland until Telefís Éireann went on the air,” he said.

Byrne seemed equally at home interviewing celebrities, children during the Christmas toy show or guests with stories about seldom-discussed topics such as divorce, abortion and sexual identity. There were awkward moments – not shaking the hands of Gerry Adams; patronising Annie Murphy, who had had a child with a bishop, Eamonn Casey.

Moya Doherty, the chair of RTÉ, said Byrne had worked during a golden age for television and radio when Ireland was grappling with change.

“Gay brought two unique gifts. He was able to see around societal corners and predict what the next emerging social, political, or cultural issue was, the new issue which needed to be brought to the public stage, whatever the ensuing controversy. Most importantly Gay was a listener. He did not so much interview as allow his guests to almost interview themselves while he listened carefully interjecting only to push them on key points.”

Micheál Martin, the leader of Fianna Fáil, said Byrne had left an indelible mark on Irish society. “His intellect and emotional intelligence was unparalleled and his ability to sensitively approach delicate and sometimes controversial issues set him apart from other presenters.”

JEWISH VOICE for PEACE

JVP Action header with logo

Last Saturday, Senator Elizabeth Warren became the latest Presidential candidate to say she would consider conditioning military aid to Israel if Netanyahu doesn’t move in the direction of a two-state solution. 

We’re glad to see more and more progressive Democrats catching up to their base, but we need to make sure Warren knows that the problem isn’t just Netanyahu, that the two-state solution means nothing when there’s one unequal state on the ground, and that there is no time to waste. We need to hold Israel accountable for its human rights violations now

Tell Warren to take the first step toward justice, equality, and accountability by using her power as a sitting Senator to ensure no military aid goes toward the detention and abuse of Palestinian children by the Israeli military.

For the first time in years, politicians are realizing that we shouldn’t be writing blank checks for the Israeli military and government. We need to ensure they understand that the U.S. must use its influence to create the conditions for justice, equality, and human rights – and it must do so now. 

Senator Warren doesn’t need to be president to get serious about conditioning aid to Israel and applying her progressive values universally. Tell her to take the first step by protecting Palestinian children now.

Rep. McCollum (MN-D) has introduced H.R. 2407, a House resolution that would amend the Leahy Law to ensure no U.S. military funding goes toward the military detention and prosecution of children – in Israel/Palestine or any country. We need our leaders in the Senate to take the same bold stance and hold Israel accountable for its violations of children’s rights. 

We are decades past “wait and see.” We know how the Israeli government uses U.S. military aid, and we need to put a stop to it immediately.

Senator Warren can take the first step toward justice, equality, and accountability by using the power she already has as a sitting Senator to ensure no military aid goes toward the detention and abuse of Palestinian children by the Israeli military.
 

head shot

Beth Miller
Government Affairs Manager
 

JVP Action is a multiracial, intergenerational movement of Jews and allies working toward justice and equality in Israel/Palestine by transforming U.S. policy. We are an independent, nonpartisan, 501(c)(4) organization formed as the political and advocacy arm of Jewish VOICE FOR PEACE

JVP Action
712 H St NE
Suite 1363
Washington, DC 20002
United States

AS TRUMP ABANDONS THE KURDS ,ISRAEL WORRIES BECAUSE THEY VERY WELL BE NEXTSTARTING WITH THE CANCELLING OF ALL FINACIAL SUPPORT. ABOUT TIME TOO.

As Trump abandons Kurds, Israel worries how dependable he is

Associated Press

 JOSEF FEDERMAN,Associated Press 16 hours ago

FILE – In this March 25, 2019, file photo, President Donald Trump and visiting Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu walk along the Colonnade of the White House in Washington. For the past three years, Netanyahu has bet heavily on Trump and been rewarded with major diplomatic gains in exchange for his warm embrace of the U.S. leader. But the U.S. pullback from northeastern Syria, essentially abandoning its Kurdish allies, has called that strategy, and Trump’s reliability as a friend, into question. (AP Photo/Manuel Balce Ceneta, File)

JERUSALEM (AP) — For the past three years, Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has bet heavily on President Donald Trump and been rewarded with major diplomatic gains in exchange for his warm embrace of the U.S. leader.

But the U.S. pullback from northeastern Syria, essentially abandoning its Kurdish allies, has called that strategy — and Trump’s reliability as a friend — into question. In particular, there are growing fears that Israel’s archenemy Iran could be emboldened by what appears to be an increasingly hands-off American policy in the region.

“The Israelis had thought of Trump as a special U.S. leader very much in tune with their view of the region,” said Dan Shapiro, who was former U.S. President Barack Obama’s ambassador to Israel. “Now they’re coming to terms with the cold hard reality that his isolationist instincts and his chaotic, impulsive decision making can actually be very damaging to their interests.”

It is a surprising turn of events for Netanyahu, who has been one of Trump’s strongest supporters on the international stage.

That alliance yielded a wealth of dividends for Netanyahu during the first few years of the Trump administration — perhaps none so striking as Trump’s decision to break with decades of U.S. policy and recognize Jerusalem as Israel’s capital. He moved the American Embassy to the contested holy city, enraging the Palestinians.

Trump also withdrew from the international nuclear deal with Iran — an agreement that Israel had derided as weak and ineffective. He defended Israel from its many critics at the United Nations, and, early this year, recognized Israel’s annexation of the Golan Heights, captured from Syria in the 1967 Mideast war.

Netanyahu routinely boasts that Trump is the best friend that Israel has ever had in the White House. But things have begun to change since he failed to win reelection in April and was forced to hold a second, inconclusive vote last month.

During the first campaign for the April race, Trump embraced Netanyahu’s candidacy and made little secret of his support, inviting the Israeli leader to the White House when he announced his recognition of the Golan Heights annexation.

But during the do-over race, Trump kept his distance. And after Netanyahu last month failed for a second time to win a parliamentary majority in national elections, Trump appeared to play down the friendship. “Our relations are with Israel, so we’ll see what happens,” he said.

Concerns have only deepened following a series of moves in which Trump backed away from possible military confrontations. In June, he called off a planned attack against Iran in response to the shooting down of an American drone. Trump also decided against military action in response to an alleged Iranian attack on Saudi oil facilities last month, saying he did not want war.

Then, this week, he abruptly withdrew U.S. troops from Kurdish areas in northeastern Syria, clearing the way for a Turkish invasion aimed at crushing the Kurds, America’s allies in the fight against the Islamic State group. Trump has defended the move by saying the United States should not be “fighting and policing” in the Middle East. But it reportedly caught Israeli officials off guard.

The fear is that Trump’s actions, or lack thereof, could encourage Iran to step up what Israel sees as aggressive and hostile activity in Syria, Lebanon and Iraq.

“The main image is a very weak U.S. that does not help its allies. It deserts its allies,” said Eytan Gilboa, an expert on U.S.-Israel relations at Israel’s Bar-Ilan University.

Israeli officials declined to comment about Trump’s decision in northern Syria but said relations with the U.S. remain strong and the country is more than capable of defending itself.

“We will always remember and implement the basic rule that has guided us: Israel will defend itself, by itself, against any threat,” Netanyahu said at a memorial ceremony Thursday for soldiers killed in the 1973 Mideast war. “The Israeli military is prepared to preempt any threat, defensively and offensively, with crushing strength.”

But while officials have stopped short of openly criticizing Trump, the American pullback from Syria has pushed some to question Netanyahu’s close alliance. That support has had the effect of alienating some of Israel’s traditional backers in the Democratic Party and the overwhelmingly liberal Jewish American community and caused friction with allies in Europe.

“From Jerusalem’s perspective, it is another warning sign that this president — until recently presented as Israel’s greatest friend ever in Washington — can’t be trusted,” said Amos Harel, a commentator in the Haaretz daily. “Again, one must wonder whether too much reliance hadn’t been placed on Trump, at the cost of Netanyahu distancing himself far from the Democrats and undermining traditional bipartisan support in Washington for Israel.”

Ofer Shelach, a lawmaker with the Blue and White Party, the main rival of Netanyahu’s Likud party, said the events in northeastern Syria are “more evidence of Benjamin Netanyahu’s ongoing diplomatic failure.” He said that despite the close ties with Netanyahu, Trump does “what suits him.”

But not everyone views the U.S. move as necessarily bad for Israel — or all that new. Yaakov Amidror, Netanyahu’s former national security adviser, said Trump’s disengagement in many ways continues Obama’s reluctance to become embroiled in yet another Mideast conflict.

Although a U.S. exit from the region could have “very bad consequences” in terms of Iranian actions, he said it also could create new opportunities. Not having to worry about the “sensitivities” of U.S. troops in the area could give Israel more freedom to act, he said.

“The space is more opened to not just the Iranians but to us,” he said.

___

The statement that the CIA made some time back that in 20 years time zionist israel and all the jewish zionists would not exist , seems to becoming true

.

I WAS STOPPED FROM SPEAKING OUT AGAINST ISRAEL,S CRIMES:OMAR BARGHOUTI

I was stopped from speaking out against Israel’s crimes – Britain’s complicity in Palestinian repression must end :OMAR BARGHOUTI

The Independent

 Omar Barghouti,The Independent Mon, 23 Sep

I was set to take part in a Labour Party conference fringe event this weekend talking about my work advocating for Palestinian rights – but was unable to travel to Brighton because of a peculiar delay in the processing of my UK visa application. I suspect that Israel’s far-right government has once again outsourced its desperate war of repression against those supporting Palestinian rights to another western government.

I was invited to two different events, organised by the National Education Union, Palestine Solidarity Campaign and Momentum-aligned fringe event The World Transformed, to speak about the Palestinian struggle for freedom, justice and equality and our nonviolent resistance to Israel’s decades-old regime of occupation, settler-colonialism and apartheid.

I was planning to expose the deepening complicity of the British governmentcorporations and institutions, in enabling Israel’s brutal system of oppression, while highlighting how Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions – a non-violent tactic against the occupation – has become a significant partner in a growing international progressive wave fighting the global far-right led by Trump.

Yet the space in which advocates of Palestinian rights can – without persecution – expose decades of Palestinian dispossession, forcible displacement and daily humiliation by a settler-colonial regime is shrinking rapidly.

After a charity event in Tower Hamlets advocating for Palestinian rights was blocked by the council, keenly aware of this shrinking space and expanding repression by public institutions in the UK, Palestinian figures wrote, “The rights of all British citizens to accurately describe, inform and convey the reality of ongoing Palestinian dispossession, and to call for action to resist these illegalities, belongs in the public space. All public bodies have an obligation to protect and defend these rights, to maintain democracy.”

The clearest case of this rising suppression of freedom of expression is the collusion of western establishments in Israel’s desperate war to delegitimise the BDS movement for Palestinian rights.

In May, the German Bundestag passed a resolution smearing BDS as “antisemitic”. More than 240 Jewish and Israeli scholars, including authorities on antisemitism and history of the Holocaust, condemned the “deceitful” resolution, saying it did nothing to “advance the urgent fight against antisemitism” and ignored the BDS movement’s explicit condemnation of “all forms of racism, including antisemitism”.

Daniel Blatman, a prominent Israeli Holocaust era historian and chief historian of the Warsaw Ghetto Museum, was even more blunt. He wrote, “That is how a country where antisemitism was a political tool that contributed to the rise of the Nazis’ murderous enterprise became a country that promotes distortion of anti-Semitism as a tool to facilitate the political persecution of a nonviolent [BDS] movement that fights the occupation, the oppression of the Palestinians and the war crimes Israel perpetrates in the territories”.

In the UK, communities secretary Robert Jenrick promised days ago to go after local authorities that adopt BDS-related measures that aim to end complicity with corporations implicated in violating Palestinian human rights, again citing antisemitism.

At the root of these and similarly weaponised claims of antisemitism is a desperate attempt to promote a new, anti-Palestinian definition of antisemitism that “serves to shield Israel from being held accountable to universal standards of human rights and international law”, as stated last year by more than 40 international Jewish groups.http://players.brightcove.net/624246174001/default_default/index.html?videoId=5837728067001Support free-thinking journalism and attend Independent events

Dozens of UK Black, Asian and minority ethnic groups have also denounced this new definition as a thinly veiled attempt “to silence a public discussion of what happened in Palestine and to the Palestinians in 1948, when the majority of its people were forcibly expelled”.

In spite of this political persecution, our inclusive BDS movement is growing substantially – its impact is multiplying rapidly through building principled and intersectional alliances with global movements fighting for racial, indigenous, social, economic, gender and climate justice. As Angela Davis always reminds us: justice is indivisible.

Just last week, the UK Trades Union Congress (TUC), representing millions of working people, voted for ending military trade with Israel and to pressure corporations to end complicity in its violations of Palestinian rights. In its conference last year, the Labour Party adopted a freeze of arms sales to Israel. Unite the Union, voted in June to boycott HP-branded companies over their involvement in Israel’s violations of Palestinian human rights.

These and many other expressions of support for Palestinian rights give us hope and inspire us to continue our march to liberation. There have always been attempts to muzzle our voices, and to break our spirits and bodies, but wherever we live, at home or in exile, Palestinians remain steadfast in our commitment to fight not only McCarthyism and repression but apartheid and settler-colonialism. We will persist in the pursuit of our UN-stipulated rights, including self-determination, and the return of our people made refugees through ethnic cleansing.

They prevented me from being in the UK to speak yesterday, but they have failed to silence me. I spoke via video about my people’s tireless struggle for our rights and about the legal and ethical necessity to end UK complicity in maintaining Israel’s denial of those rights.

They fear our shining a light of truth that reveals their lies. They dread our tireless quest for justice. They loathe our love for freedom and our insistence on nothing less than an existence with dignity and “the full menu of rights“, to borrow from South African leader Archbishop Desmond Tutu.

Omar Barghouti is a co-founder of the Boycott, Divestment, Sanctions (BDS) movement for Palestinian rights

ISREAL ELECTION:PM BENJAMIN NETANYAHU REFUSES TO CONCEDE DEFEAT ,AND THUS SHOWING ALL THAT HE IS NOT A DEMOCRATE , BUT A ZIONIST DICTATOR.

circusbuoy


News

Israel election: PM Benjamin Netanyahu refuses to concede defeat but faces fight for political life

Evening Standard

Rebecca Speare-Cole,Evening StandardWed, 18 Sep 08:56 CES

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the Likud Party after vote event: Getty Images

Israeli Prime MinisterBenjamin Netanyahuis facing lengthy coalition talks as he fights for his political life after he tied with rivalBenny Gantzin early results.

Mr Netanyahu failed to secure a majority with his natural religious and nationalist allies in elections on Tuesday, with the exit polls currently too close to call.

But addressing his supporters early on Wednesday, he refused to concede defeat and vowed to work to form a new government that excludes Arab parties.

The result has set the stage for a period of coalition negotiations that could threaten the Prime Minister’s political future and even clear the way for him to be tried on corruption charges.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stands next to his wife Sara as he waves to supporters at his Likud party headquarters following the announcement of exit polls. (REUTERS)

Initial partial results showed Mr Gantz’s centrist Blue and White party tied with Mr Netanyahu’s…

View original post 1,140 more words

ISREAL ELECTION:PM BENJAMIN NETANYAHU REFUSES TO CONCEDE DEFEAT ,AND THUS SHOWING ALL THAT HE IS NOT A DEMOCRATE , BUT A ZIONIST DICTATOR.


News

Israel election: PM Benjamin Netanyahu refuses to concede defeat but faces fight for political life

Evening Standard

 Rebecca Speare-Cole,Evening Standard Wed, 18 Sep 08:56 CES

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the Likud Party after vote event: Getty Images

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing lengthy coalition talks as he fights for his political life after he tied with rival Benny Gantz in early results.

Mr Netanyahu failed to secure a majority with his natural religious and nationalist allies in elections on Tuesday, with the exit polls currently too close to call.

But addressing his supporters early on Wednesday, he refused to concede defeat and vowed to work to form a new government that excludes Arab parties.

The result has set the stage for a period of coalition negotiations that could threaten the Prime Minister’s political future and even clear the way for him to be tried on corruption charges.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stands next to his wife Sara as he waves to supporters at his Likud party headquarters following the announcement of exit polls. (REUTERS)

Initial partial results showed Mr Gantz’s centrist Blue and White party tied with Mr Netanyahu’s Likud.

While the results do not guarantee that Mr Gantz will be the next prime minister, they signalled that Mr Netanyahu, who has led the country for over 10 years, could have trouble holding on to the job.

His campaign focused heavily on attacking and questioning the loyalty of the country’s Arab minority – a strategy that drew accusations of racism and incitement from Arab leaders.

“In the coming days we will convene negotiations to assemble a strong Zionist government and to prevent a dangerous anti-Zionist government,” he said.

Blue and White party leader Benny Gantz reacts at the party's headquarters following the announcement of exit polls. (REUTERS)

He claimed that Arab parties “negate the existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state” and “glorify bloodthirsty murderers.”

The partial results released on Wednesday by the Central Election Commission were based on 35 percent of the vote counted.

The three Israeli TV channels reported the same outcome, based on more than 90 percent of the vote counted, but did not explain the discrepancy with the commission’s percentage.

Final results are expected Wednesday and could still swing in Mr Netanyahu’s favour.

According to the partial results, the parties of Mr Gantz and Mr Netanyahu received 32 seats each in the 120-member parliament.

Blue and White party leaders, from the left, Gabi Ashkenazi, Yair Lapid, Benny Gantz and Gabi Ashkenazi. (AP)

Likud with its natural allies of religious and ultra-nationalist parties mustered 56 seats – or five short of the needed majority.

This means both Likud and Blue and White will have difficulty setting up a governing coalition without the support of Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beitenu party.

That put Mr Lieberman, a former protege of Mr Netanyahu’s who has become one of the prime minister’s fiercest rivals, in the position of kingmaker.

Arab parties, which have never before sat in an Israeli government, also finished strong, and exit polls predicted they would form the third-largest party in parliament.

Addressing his supporters late Tuesday, a jubilant Mr Lieberman said he saw only “one option”: a broad, secular coalition with both Blue and White and Likud.

“We’ve always said that a unity government is only possible in emergency situations. And I tell you and I tell every citizen today watching us on television: the situation, both security-wise and economically, are emergency situations,” he said. “The country, therefore, requires a broad government.”Read moreUS envoy: Luxembourg PM’s behaviour is reminder of why UK wants Brexit

Early Wednesday, Mr Gantz told a cheering rally of supporters that while it was too soon to declare victory, he had begun speaking to potential partners and hoped to form a unity government.

“Starting tonight we will work to form a broad unity government that will express the will of the people,” he said.

Attention will now focus on Israel’s president, Reuven Rivlin, who is to choose the candidate he believes has the best chance of forming a stable coalition.

Mr Rivlin is to consult with all parties in the coming days before making his decision.

HE(BENJAMIN NETANYAHU) IS ON THE WAY OUT AND THE ARAB PARTIES WILL HOPEFULLY BE IN THE NEW COALITION GOVERNMENT ,IT IS TOO MUCH TO HOPE THAT THE ARAB POPULATION WILL GET A JUST AND FAIR DEAL , BUT AT LEAST ANYTHING IS BETTER THAN BIBI NETANYAHU.HALF A LOAF IS BETTER THAN NONE , MAYBE A FEW FISHES AS WELL

B

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu speaks at the Likud Party after vote event: Getty Images

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu is facing lengthy coalition talks as he fights for his political life after he tied with rival Benny Gantz in early results.

Mr Netanyahu failed to secure a majority with his natural religious and nationalist allies in elections on Tuesday, with the exit polls currently too close to call.

But addressing his supporters early on Wednesday, he refused to concede defeat and vowed to work to form a new government that excludes Arab parties.

The result has set the stage for a period of coalition negotiations that could threaten the Prime Minister’s political future and even clear the way for him to be tried on corruption charges.

Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu stands next to his wife Sara as he waves to supporters at his Likud party headquarters following the announcement of exit polls. (REUTERS)

Initial partial results showed Mr Gantz’s centrist Blue and White party tied with Mr Netanyahu’s Likud.

While the results do not guarantee that Mr Gantz will be the next prime minister, they signalled that Mr Netanyahu, who has led the country for over 10 years, could have trouble holding on to the job.

His campaign focused heavily on attacking and questioning the loyalty of the country’s Arab minority – a strategy that drew accusations of racism and incitement from Arab leaders.

“In the coming days we will convene negotiations to assemble a strong Zionist government and to prevent a dangerous anti-Zionist government,” he said.

Blue and White party leader Benny Gantz reacts at the party's headquarters following the announcement of exit polls. (REUTERS)

He claimed that Arab parties “negate the existence of Israel as a Jewish and democratic state” and “glorify bloodthirsty murderers.”

The partial results released on Wednesday by the Central Election Commission were based on 35 percent of the vote counted.

The three Israeli TV channels reported the same outcome, based on more than 90 percent of the vote counted, but did not explain the discrepancy with the commission’s percentage.

Final results are expected Wednesday and could still swing in Mr Netanyahu’s favour.

According to the partial results, the parties of Mr Gantz and Mr Netanyahu received 32 seats each in the 120-member parliament.

Blue and White party leaders, from the left, Gabi Ashkenazi, Yair Lapid, Benny Gantz and Gabi Ashkenazi. (AP)

Likud with its natural allies of religious and ultra-nationalist parties mustered 56 seats – or five short of the needed majority.This means both Likud and Blue and White will have difficulty setting up a governing coalition without the support of Avigdor Lieberman’s Yisrael Beitenu party.That put Mr Lieberman, a former protege of Mr Netanyahu’s who has become one of the prime minister’s fiercest rivals, in the position of kingmaker.Arab parties, which have never before sat in an Israeli government, also finished strong, and exit polls predicted they would form the third-largest party in parliament.Addressing his supporters late Tuesday, a jubilant Mr Lieberman said he saw only “one option”: a broad, secular coalition with both Blue and White and Likud.”We’ve always said that a unity government is only possible in emergency situations. And I tell you and I tell every citizen today watching us on television: the situation, both security-wise and economically, are emergency situations,” he said. “The country, therefore, requires a broad government.”Read moreUS envoy: Luxembourg PM’s behaviour is reminder of why UK wants BrexitEarly Wednesday, Mr Gantz told a cheering rally of supporters that while it was too soon to declare victory, he had begun speaking to potential partners and hoped to form a unity government.”Starting tonight we will work to form a broad unity government that will express the will of the people,” he said.Attention will now focus on Israel’s president, Reuven Rivlin, who is to choose the candidate he believes has the best chance of forming a stable coalition.Mr Rivlin is to consult with all parties in the coming days before making his decision.Read moreRead more US envoy: Luxembourg PM’s behaviour is reminder of why UK wants BrexitComments (7)Sign in again to post a comment.