The Muslim ban fiasco…

The Muslim ban fiasco….

The President’s team had months to prepare this signature immigration initiative. And they produced…an amateurish, politically self-immolating effort that humiliated the country, provoked international retaliation, and failed to withstand the obvious federal court challenge on its very first day.

Given the despicable nature of this effort, I’m happy it has become a political fiasco. It also makes me wonder how the Trump administration will execute the basic functions of government. This astonishing failure reflects our new President’s contempt for the basic craft of government.

Comments 

At least Hitler bothered to pass the Enabling Act before he tried to dictate any orders. Not even Stalin could rule without Beria and his bureaucracy. A certain someone needs to read up on dictators and how they operated if he is to get anything actually done.
One of the millions banned from entering the USA is a British Tory MP, Nadhim Zahawi, who happens to have been born in Iraq and has adult children studying in the USA. Theresa May (not, pace the White House press office, Teresa May, a British porn star) handed Trump an invitation to London for a state visit. This has provoked a political backlash, and the visit would almost certainly be met with large and vociferous protests from Londoners. The Mayor of London. Sadiq Khan, is Muslim and will do nothing to stop them. Does Trump really want to be booed through the streets? Elizabeth II may put her foot down. I suspect the invitation will now meet insurmountable scheduling difficulties.

This may look a trivial part of the damage done by Trump and Bannon’s oprichnina governance. But perhaps it’s not trivial. Trump’s overweening vanity and insecurity makes him crave occasions for reassurance of his unearned power and fragile dominance. Having a state dinner with the Queen is valuable to him, and its withdrawal wounding.

The same goes for other state visits. Other governments are noting May’s problems and rethinking any plans for invitations. Is anybody keeping track of those sent to Trump, compared to Obama in 2009? My prediction is that Trump will be treated generally like Yitzhak Shamir in London: invited to talks in Downing Street, but not Buckingham Palace.

3 replies · active 22 hours ago

Trumpspeak to humanspeak translator: “Take us seriously, not literally” means “Shut Up” [while the trumpspeaker thinks, with a sly grin seeping through, “It’s going to be worse than you can imagine.”] “Alternative facts” means “Shut Up” [while the trumpspeaker thinks, with a sly grin distorting his/her face, “You’re the enemy. You’ll never get a straight answer out of me.”] “I’m like, a smart person” means “Shut Up.” “People are saying” accompanied by a word salad of innuendo, insinuation and nonsense means “Shut Up.”
 
The Prime Minister of Ireland is usually guaranteed an hour’s “face time” (often more) with the US President on St Patrick’s Day. Trump has extended the invitation, it has been accepted, but the pressure is on here for the PM Enda Kenny to cancel. I do not think he will, but this imbroglio now means the meeting will be a bit fraught, “… more than just exchanging shamrocks and good wishes …” as one Gov minister put it on TV today.
http://www.irishtimes.com/news/politics/over-12-0…

Incidentally, the UK petition numbers mean that it must be debated by the House of Commons.

BTW, there was a story in the London “Sunday Times” today that Trump’s minions were trying to cut Prince Charles off from meeting the President, in case he had the temerity to lecture The Great Man on climate change. In which case, it was said, “Trump would explode”.

Go for it, Charlie!

1 reply · active 17 minutes ago

Methane is a very potent greenhouse gas. Therefore, we do want Trump to explode. There might be a way to capture the methane if Trump slouches off this mortal coil, in which case, as the saying goes, they could bury him in a shoebox. (I’m hoping for a best case scenario where the shoebox isn’t hung from a lamppost in lieu of proper burial.)
America has a provisional government, whose membership rotates every four years or so, and a permanent government, whose membership remains stable for decades. This is pretty much a shopworn cliché but there are some observations to be made.

It appears this morning that the heads of the new provisional government (Trump, Steve Bannon) are trying to bypass the permanent government (Pentagon, CIA), and expects the permanent government to take it all lying down. Even “normal” heads of the provisional government (like Obama) rarely gain much traction against the permanent government. And that is when they do not insult them, cut them out of the loop, and otherwise slap them metaphorically in the face.

This morning Robert Gates, former CIA director and Defense Secretary, who has served under eight presidents, said that it was a “big mistake” to cut the Director of National Intelligence and the Joint Chiefs out of the National Security loop.

We shall soon see whether the permanent government lets this happen without pushback. “Big mistake” sounds like code for something. Not exactly a horse’s head in the bed, but a warning. He who hath ears, let him hear.

It is also revealing that Gates was mild and cautious in expressing his reservations about the immigration policies that hurt people and families. But in expressing his disapprobation of the provisional head of state messing with the prerogatives of the permanent state, he was unequivocal.

The permanent government is not amused. Not one bit.

Advertisements

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s